If you are suspected or charged with a criminal offence, such as causing or inciting a child to engage in sexual activity, you need to act quickly.

First, where the defendant is over 18 years old.

If the child is under 13, it does not matter whether the adult knew the age of the child. If the child is under 16, the prosecution will need to prove that the adult did not reasonably believe the child was 16 or over. What is ‘reasonable’ will be determined by the jury applying an objective standard.

Second, where the defendant is under 18 years old.

If the child is under 13, the age of the defendant does not matter. An offence can be committed by a child even under the age of 13.

This offence sits alongside other child sexual offences under the Sexual Offences Act 2003, and the same defence principles often apply.

    How can we assist you

    Submit the form to receive a call back from our specialist team

    Abuse of trust.

    Doctors, school teachers, social workers and health professionals are particularly vulnerable to allegations of sexual misconduct because they frequently work with young or vulnerable people and are seen as being in positions of power or authority. Where work is completed in a one on one environment they are particularly vulnerable to false allegations.

    Offences relating to an abuse of trust involve:

    • Sexual activity with a child (s.16 Sexual Offences Act 2003)
    • Causing or inciting a child to engage in sexual activity (s.17 Sexual Offences Act 2003)
    • Sexual activity in the presence of a child (s.18 Sexual Offences Act 2003)
    • Causing a child to watch a sexual act (s.19 Sexual Offences Act 2003.

    If the complainant is under 18, or has a mental disorder (even if over 18) it is not a defence to claim that the person consented.

    The prosecution must prove that the person was in a position of trust. This means that the person must have responsibility for the care of a person under 18.

    For an offence under s.16 (sexual activity with a child), the prosecution must prove that the defendant touched the young person sexually. Defence if the defendant reasonably believed the person to be 18 or over but it is up to the defendant to raise this defence. This defence is not available if the child was under 13.

    For an offence under s.17 (causing or inciting a child to engage in sexual activity), the prosecution must prove the defendant caused or incited a child to engage in a sexual activity. This offence can arise when a person in a position of trust provides a young person in his or her care to another person. The person in a position of trust does not need to be there at the time of the sexual activity. An offence also arises if a person in a position of trust encourages a young person to do something sexual in his or her presence, even if there has been no physical contact.

    These offences be dealt with in the Magistrates’ Court but most will be dealt with in the Crown Court. Maximum sentence is 5 years in prison.

    Let’s talk.

    Contact our team to discuss your case or concerns with one of our sexual offence specialists.

    Our initial consultations are always free, and we manage all enquiries securely and confidentially.

    0151 705 8488

    info@pcdsolicitors.co.uk

    The Maltings, 100 Wilderspool Causeway,
    Warrington, Cheshire, WA4 6PU, UK

      How can we help?

      Submit the form to receive a call back from our specialist team

      Hear From
      Our Clients.

      PCD Solicitors are proud to provide an outstanding standard of client care and support.

      Elliot

      Marcus sorted out my images case for me. Top team got me a great result. Really pleased with the outcome as I can now move on with my life. Thanks Marcus

      Conor

      I contacted Marcus after being arrested and accused of accusations I did not do, after speaking to him on the phone and explaining my story , Marcus advised me on a lot of details in cases related to my situation. Although it cost me a lot of money which was a hard hit to take for something I did not do Marcus informed me that it may be the best money I’ve spent , and gambling with something that could potentially change my life in a bad way forever was not a gamblers I was willing to take. Marcus had my confidence that him and his team would get the outcome I was aiming to achieve which they did! I also would like to thank Rhiannan the assistant of Marcus who was available and also asked me if there’s anything I need to contact her anytime. Would recommend.

      Simeon

      Great initial consultation, helped me to understand the process and very reassuring about my situation.

      Anonymous

      Pcd Solicitors were very friends, never judged, heard your side of the story and listened to how you got to the offending. They actively set out to help contact people and the police. Explain everything and anything you were unsure on. Especially Rhiannon she was extremely kind spoke to me like a human being. After researching for Solicitors I came across PCD and they contacted me the same day after i put in an enquirey. They have fixed prices and payment plans to help.

      Anonymous

      After a horrendous experience being arrested for a serious allegation, I contacted PCD online. Within 20 minutes at about 8pm, I had a call from Dylan. After a 20 minute call, I knew I was in good hands Alicia was on the case as soon as instructed and has been there throughout. Received the NFA letter with huge relief, and the team were still there, reassuring me. Grateful for the support and reassurance of a responsive team.

      Steven Thomas

      i have only just started my journey with them but so far they have been amazing, very aformatiove and helpful